Pharma4i home

Articles

Writing on how user requirements are derived, specified and qualified for regulated manufacturing equipment. Everything here is free to read.

What Annex 1 (2022) changed for equipment user requirement specifications

The revised Annex 1 made the contamination control strategy the organising principle for sterile manufacturing. Here is what that means, requirement by requirement, when specifying equipment.

4 min readAnnex 1, Sterile manufacturing, Regulatory

Writing testable requirements: eliminating adequate, suitable and user-friendly

A requirement that cannot fail cannot be tested. How to convert vague qualifiers into acceptance criteria a qualification protocol can verify.

3 min readURS practice, Testability, Traceability1 view

The six parameters you should never assume in a vial filling URS

Six values that decide whether a filling line is fit for the product, and which are almost always inherited from the last project rather than derived from this one.

3 min readFilling lines, URS practice, Assumptions

100,000 vials per day is not a specification — deriving machine speed for a filling line

A daily output figure hides shift pattern, changeover, line efficiency and rejects. Here is the arithmetic that turns it into a nominal machine speed a supplier can quote against.

4 min readFilling lines, Requirements derivation, Capacity

Why a URS written from a vendor specification fails Design Qualification

A user requirement specification copied from a supplier's technical proposal cannot demonstrate that the design meets the user's needs, because the design and the requirement have the same author.

3 min readDesign Qualification, URS practice, GAMP 5

Prefer a reader? Subscribe to the RSS feed.